I am humbled by your simple words of thanks and appreciation. Yours, 1 in 1000 comments, is what I strive for in being a messenger, not the message. If I had an award for the best comment of the month, you would win August already…and you would win for the best of the whole last 12 months, too!

Thanks for chiming in. Please come back often! We put new stuff up every few days.

Cheers!

I am humbled by your simple words of thanks and appreciation. Yours, 1 in 1000 comments, is what I strive for in being a messenger, not the message. If I had an award for the best comment of the month, you would win August already…and you would win for the best of the whole last 12 months, too!

Thanks for chiming in. Please come back often! We put new stuff up every few days.

Cheers!

And why do you continue this discussion if you think I’m a liberal plant for Edwards? There would be no point in trying to change my mind if that were the case, yet you persist. And if you have been successful in showing that, then why would you persist? Your actions make no sense, unless you truly thought I was a Conservative who had lost his way and needed advice or more information…but if that is the case, attacking me is very much the wrong way to go about the process…it just pushes Conservatives further away, and certainly does not endear us to unify with you and your candidate. And if the blog is as insignificant as you say, with as few readers as you say, why does the argument even matter to you. Will Flores called me insignificant to the race, yet he persisted, too.

RINOs are very strange creatures.

I voted in the 2008 Election. Bill Flores did not. By your own standard, it is HE who is responsible for Chet Edwards being in office, not I. Yet you vilify me? That’s really messed up.

The fact that you are surprised that I did not erase your comment tells every reader here that you really do not have a clue about how things operate on principle here. You should examine the evidence and use that for your basis of opinion, not your templated ideas and hopes. Your comment confirmed the topic of this post, verifying my accuracy in reporting: You think Bill Flores is a RINO. You have helped Chet Edwards’ cause more than I ever could if I even wanted to, with that simple statement on the record.

I have given you leeway on your two comments that do not stick to the topic at hand without personal attack. Find another topic upon which to somment, or further comments from you wil be moderated as set forth in the policies…which you would do well to read along with the rest of the static page. They, too, won’t fit your template, of course, but that does not change their veracity.

And why do you continue this discussion if you think I’m a liberal plant for Edwards? There would be no point in trying to change my mind if that were the case, yet you persist. And if you have been successful in showing that, then why would you persist? Your actions make no sense, unless you truly thought I was a Conservative who had lost his way and needed advice or more information…but if that is the case, attacking me is very much the wrong way to go about the process…it just pushes Conservatives further away, and certainly does not endear us to unify with you and your candidate. And if the blog is as insignificant as you say, with as few readers as you say, why does the argument even matter to you. Will Flores called me insignificant to the race, yet he persisted, too.

RINOs are very strange creatures.

I voted in the 2008 Election. Bill Flores did not. By your own standard, it is HE who is responsible for Chet Edwards being in office, not I. Yet you vilify me? That’s really messed up.

The fact that you are surprised that I did not erase your comment tells every reader here that you really do not have a clue about how things operate on principle here. You should examine the evidence and use that for your basis of opinion, not your templated ideas and hopes. Your comment confirmed the topic of this post, verifying my accuracy in reporting: You think Bill Flores is a RINO. You have helped Chet Edwards’ cause more than I ever could if I even wanted to, with that simple statement on the record.

I have given you leeway on your two comments that do not stick to the topic at hand without personal attack. Find another topic upon which to somment, or further comments from you wil be moderated as set forth in the policies…which you would do well to read along with the rest of the static page. They, too, won’t fit your template, of course, but that does not change their veracity.

You still haven’t explained to anyone how keeping Chet in office by not voting is preferrable to getting Republican control of that seat. It’s this simple: If you are advocating for conervatives to not vote, you are advocating for the Democrat to maintain control of that seat. That’s what happened in the 2008 Presidential election. How’d that work out for you? So, by encouraging conservatives to not vote in Texas CD17 you are actively campaigning for Chet Edwards. If you can’t understand that logic, that’s sad. I am betting the few who read this blog will easily understand that fact.

You still haven’t explained to anyone how keeping Chet in office by not voting is preferrable to getting Republican control of that seat. It’s this simple: If you are advocating for conervatives to not vote, you are advocating for the Democrat to maintain control of that seat. That’s what happened in the 2008 Presidential election. How’d that work out for you? So, by encouraging conservatives to not vote in Texas CD17 you are actively campaigning for Chet Edwards. If you can’t understand that logic, that’s sad. I am betting the few who read this blog will easily understand that fact.

Go tell Chet he has to send another minion. You don’t seem to be working out too well for him.

Go tell Chet he has to send another minion. You don’t seem to be working out too well for him.